<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>AI on Arve's Playground</title><link>https://www.arvesv.com/tags/ai/</link><description>Recent content in AI on Arve's Playground</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>2026 Arve Svendsen. All rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 11:05:26 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.arvesv.com/tags/ai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI as a Pair Programmer</title><link>https://www.arvesv.com/posts/2026/ai_pair_programming/</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.arvesv.com/posts/2026/ai_pair_programming/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I do think AI/LLMs have value, but not as much as the “AI enthusiast crowd”
thinks. I like specific concrete examples of what AI can do. I think that
treating AI as a pair programmer is one case where it provides value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don’t have much experience with human pair programming, but I have seen that
having multiple people design and review code as it is written can be
fantastically productive — and sometimes not. If you are a single developer,
you can use AI as your pair programmer by asking it to explain and review code,
suggest alternatives, and look for ways to simplify. In this setup, you are
still the developer: the AI may write code, but you still need to understand
it. Used this way, AI challenges your ideas, helps you learn, and leads to
better code.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>AI/LLM Assisted Development — May 2026 Edition</title><link>https://www.arvesv.com/posts/2026/moreaidevelopment/</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 16:14:54 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://www.arvesv.com/posts/2026/moreaidevelopment/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I write these summaries to structure my own thinking about AI/LLM-assisted development — and to have something to look back on (and probably cringe at) in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What has happened in the last 3–6 months&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;AI/LLM prices are increasing&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Local and mobile models are surprisingly capable&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;CLI-based AI tools continue to work extremely well&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;AI/LLMs remain excellent for search, explanation, and learning&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A wave of buzzwords: skills, multi-agent, CLI, MCP, plan mode&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;AI tools still make mistakes, especially in uncharted territory&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;h3 id="aillm-prices-are-going-up"&gt;AI/LLM prices are going up&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GitHub Copilot is changing its pricing structure this month. Anthropic and others are restricting the use of fixed-price subscription keys with third‑party tools like OpenClaw. The trend is clear: pricing will increasingly reflect actual resource usage — and it will be higher.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Another Experience with AI Coding Assistants</title><link>https://www.arvesv.com/posts/2026/vibecoding/</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 03:25:08 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://www.arvesv.com/posts/2026/vibecoding/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I watched DHH&amp;rsquo;s demo of the &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZankuDQQmw"&gt;Once&lt;/a&gt; deployment tool and where he vibe coded a demo app, and I figured I should try to do the same. Three hours and roughly twenty prompts later, I had a publicly available web app up and running.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is written in ASP.NET, has database access, schema migrations,
zero-downtime updates, social login and a semi-generic system for reporting. It works &amp;ndash; and I didn’t write or modify a single line of code myself. The AI/LLM coding capabilities impressed me. I could have built the same thing without AI, but it would have taken far longer.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>My Experience with AI Coding Assistants</title><link>https://www.arvesv.com/posts/ai-assisted-development/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.arvesv.com/posts/ai-assisted-development/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I use &lt;a href="https://github.com/features/copilot/plans"&gt;GitHub Copilot (Pro)&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://geminicli.com"&gt;Google Gemini CLI&lt;/a&gt;&lt;sup id="fnref:1"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;.
Do coding assistants help me develop faster, improve code, or cause other effects?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Disclaimer: The way we use AI assisted development will continue to evolve and these are my thoughts and experiences with coding assistants as of November 2025.
I expect to look back on this post and feel embarrassed - but that’s part of the journey.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I use AI coding assistants in different ways, each with its own impact.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>